Logo

SAVE up to 67% vs. a typical high street Solicitor

Providing Accessible and Affordable Legal Services to All

[email protected]
0151 230 8931

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Legal Services
    • Breach of Contract Claims
    • Consumer Rights
    • Debt/Money Claims
    • Deed Polls
    • Direct Access Barristers
    • Flight Delay Claims – Regulation 261
    • Landlord & Tenant Disputes/Claims
    • Legal Costs
    • Legal Document Drafting
    • Paralegal Support
    • Process/Document Serving
    • Reduce your Solicitors’ Bill
    • Small Claims
    • Will Drafting
    • If we can’t help, try…..
      • Direct Access Barristers
  • Downloads
  • Testimonials
  • Contact Us
  • Client Area
    • Pay your Invoice
    • Document Management

There is no Special Treatment for People who Act for Themselves

April 23, 2018 By White Collar Legal and Admin

In the past week, we have represented a claimant in a fast track trial and also defended a claim brought by a claimant in a small claims hearing. In both cases, the claimants (one being our client and the other being our opponent) were represented by solicitors at the outset of their claim. However, due to cost constraints they decided to go it alone. At the end of their respective cases, both claimants were penalised significantly as to costs.

In respect of our client, rather than use a solicitor he decided to use his brother who has an IQ of over 150 but was not a lawyer and had no knowledge of the law. His brother undertook a significant amount of research using Google to try and plead our client’s case and not only that, failed to consistently set out his case with various numbers of statements of case being inconsistent with previous ones.

When we were instructed, the case had already been allocated to the fast track and we were just 3 months before trial. By that time, it was too late to make the significant changes required to our client’s statements and pleadings because of the numerous inconsistencies. Strangely enough, the defendant in the fast track case had offered to settle and despite our client receiving advice from two different barristers stating he was going to lose (and should discontinue, he was wholly swayed by his much cleverer brother who had done lots of research but still did not understand the law. The offers to settle were rejected and we were instructed to represent our client at the fast track trial. The opposing barrister in that trial tore our client apart pointing out to him and the court the various inconsistencies in his pleaded case and his witness evidence. Our client’s credibility was shot to pieces and most of the questions that were answered by our client contained reference to his brother drafting the various letters, statements and pleadings. Our client lost the case and was ordered to pay a sum of £23,000 in costs (as a result of our representation we did manage to save our client £9,000).

In the second case this week, we represented a small broadband company who was being sued by a claimant who had engaged solicitors pre-action. Again, due to cost constraints, the claimant decided to issue proceedings himself and pursue the small claim via Money Claim Online. The claim form that he had prepared did not replicate any of the claims that were made in the letter of claim prepared by his solicitors. The matter was allocated to the small claims track and directions given for witness evidence. The claimant acknowledged the order in writing but did not file or serve any witness evidence to support his claim. The matter came to the small claims hearing and prior to going in, the judge asked the parties whether the claimant had filed or served any witness evidence and obviously, he had not. Throughout the hearing, the claimant was questioned by the judge and told in no uncertain terms that the rules of the court and directions must be met by everyone. The claimant kept making excuses stating that he was not a lawyer and he didn’t know what he was doing. The judge found on a balance of probabilities that the claimant knew of the requirement to file evidence and struck out his claim. We were successful in obtaining an unreasonable costs order against the claimant in the sum of £795.00. The claimant did protest on the basis that he was not a lawyer and he was told by his solicitors that he would not have to pay costs as this was a small claim.

There is a common theme in both cases where the claimants have used solicitors at the outset but due to costs and charges of those solicitors, decided to act for themselves. The law now provides that there is no special treatment for people who act for themselves and therefore it is essential for any person embarking on any legal matter in the civil justice system to either seek independent legal advice or ensure that they fully comply with the rules of the court which are contained in the Civil Procedure Rules.

Whilst it is perhaps common that solicitors’ fees are high, or at least disproportionate to the value of the case, we do urge all litigants to thoroughly search the market when embarking on any legal matter to see whether there is an affordable lawyer out there who can advise on the prospects and procedural elements of a case. We provide such a service as our hourly rate is £45.00 per hour.  Had both claimants instructed us at the beginning, we believe that they may have been either successful or would not have embarked on the litigation which would have saved them significant costs.

Filed Under: Blog Tagged With: Civil Litigation, Claims, Consumer, Legal, Legal Services, Litigant in Person, Litigation

Reasons to Talk to Us

SAVE up to 67% versus a typical high street solicitor
FREE Initial consultation
Fully Insured, Experienced and Regulated
White Collar has the knowledge and expertise you need
We are easy to talk to and give advice in plain English
If we can’t do the job, we know someone that can
Nationwide and Worldwide coverage

Contact Us

  • 1 Old Hall Street, Liverpool, L3 9HF
  • [email protected]
  • 0151 230 8931
  • 0151 808 1320

Online Enquiry

* indicates required field
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The information you provide will be only used by us to administer your enquiry and any response. Use of this form does not create an attorney-client relationship and information transmitted will not necessarily be treated as privileged or confidential. If you are a client, please get in touch with your usual firm contact directly for the most timely response.

Twitter

Tweets by @WhiteCollarQPAS

Services for Solicitors

We provide Costs Drafting, Advocacy, Locum Fee Earner and Litigation Support services to Solicitors:

Costs Drafting

We have 13 years experience in Civil & Commercial Litigation, Personal Injury and Costs therefore we are able to draft bills accurately and in a compliant manner to ensure maximum recovery at speed and at low cost.

Our payment terms are also competitive:

  • Bill drafting fees reduced as per recovery – ensuring that we will recover the most we can for you;
  • Fixed negotiation fees – to ensure speed and efficiency;
  • Quick turnaround with maximum settlements – to aid your cash flow;
  • Capped fees for Paying Party work;

We are simply interested in good, honest costs drafting, negotiation and advice and our aim is to ensure that your needs come first.

Therefore, unlike other costs drafting firms, we will provide you with the advice before negotiation commences so we both know where we stand in terms of likely recovery and cash flow.

With a FREE Courier Service, we not give us a try for one file and compare us.

Locum Fee Earner/Litigation Support

Having over 12 years experience in civil litigation, We have been assisting solicitor firms with their busy case loads by acting as a fee earner within their firms.

Advocacy

We are able to cover hearings across the North West and North Wales (we can travel further if needed) as your agent for Infant Settlement Approval Hearings, Possession Hearings (Landlord/Tenant and Mortgage) and Costs Hearings.  We can also cover applications, small claims and enforcement hearings.
With fixed fees being applied in many cases, we understand that the lower you pay for advocacy services, the more profit costs you keep for yourself therefore, our fees are reasonable and for most of our local Courts are even cheaper than those charged by the major advocacy agencies.

Administration Services

With over 10 years administration experience, White Collar can offer a wide range of services to assist you and your business in achieving its goals as well as allowing you to save time on things that matter most – your business. The following list is an example of those services offered by White Collar.

  • Copy Typing
  • CV Drafting
  • Data Entry
  • Form Creation
  • General Administration
  • Invoice/Receipt Management/Creation
  • List Building
  • Mail Forwarding/Scanning
  • Online Contact Management
  • Online Diary Management
  • Online Services
  • Powerpoint Presentations
  • Spreadsheets
  • Word Documents

White Collar Legal & Admin

We have over 13 years legal and administrative experience so we can help you with your most of your legal and admin needs.

Reasons to Talk to Us

SAVE up to 67% versus a typical high street solicitor
FREE Initial consultation
Fully Insured, Experienced and Regulated
White Collar has the knowledge and expertise you need
We are easy to talk to and give advice in plain English
If we can’t do the job, we know someone that can
Nationwide and Worldwide coverage

Like us or follow us

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

We are members of…

PPR Practising Certificate

Business Approval Register

Lawshare

Civil Litigation solicitors Wirral

Clerksroom Direct

PPH Logo

Privacy Policy | © 2023 White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd
Website hosting by Lift Legal Marketing · Log in


The White Collar & Scales Logo is a registered trademark owned by White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd. White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales; Reg No.09105650; Registered Address: 1 Old Hall Street, Liverpool, L3 9HF. VAT Number: 273 5212 16.

Data Protection Registration: ZA069814. Our Privacy Policy can be accessed by Clicking Here
Philip Nam F.Inst.Pa G.CILEx Q.Med.Pa (Director) is a Fellow of the Institute of Paralegals (member#207496) and is authorised and voluntarily regulated by the Professional Paralegal Register.
The legal information given on this website is subject to our Legal Information Disclaimer which can be accessed by Clicking Here (opens in a PDF)
Our website use disclaimer can be found by Clicking Here (opens in a PDF)

This site tracks visits anonymously using cookies. Close this dialogue to confirm you are happy with that or find out more in the Privacy Policy. Agree and close
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT