Logo

SAVE up to 67% vs. a typical high street Solicitor

Providing Accessible and Affordable Legal Services to All

[email protected]
0151 230 8931

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Legal Services
    • Breach of Contract Claims
    • Consumer Rights
    • Debt/Money Claims
    • Deed Polls
    • Direct Access Barristers
    • Flight Delay Claims – Regulation 261
    • Landlord & Tenant Disputes/Claims
    • Legal Costs
    • Legal Document Drafting
    • Paralegal Support
    • Process/Document Serving
    • Reduce your Solicitors’ Bill
    • Small Claims
    • Will Drafting
    • If we can’t help, try…..
      • Direct Access Barristers
  • Downloads
  • Testimonials
  • Contact Us
  • Client Area
    • Pay your Invoice
    • Document Management

Costs drafting with experience

July 2, 2015 By White Collar Legal and Admin

I was recently instructed by a firm of solicitors to attend a Detailed Assessment hearing following what appeared to be a very poor decision at Provisional Assessment.

The Solicitors had used previously a costs drafting firm based in South West Lancashire to draft the bill, prepare Replies and negotiate settlement and progress the matter. They had advised the solicitor that they could not attend the hearing (no idea why)

The matter was a Road Traffic Accident involving 2 passengers and had gone to Trial on the basis that it was staged accident. The Solicitors had made 2 Part 36 Offers, one in May 2012 (prior to issue) and one in June 2014 (months before Trial). Both were beaten at Trial but the Court only awarded Standard Base costs.

The Claimants who initially instructed that they were able to understand English later suggested that they could not and suggested that they could understand Polish. Translation of documents were therefore provided in Polish and certified and a Trial listed for Autumn 2013. However, the Claimants at the Trial stated that they did not understand Polish and advised that they required a Slovak Interpreter. They were of course ordered to pay the costs of the vacated Trial.

The drafted bill came out at £59,000 (including 100% Success Fee) and included the additional costs in relation to the first translation and interpretation (there was no order to exclude them).

In addition, the bill bizarrely had been split into 3 parts – Part 1 for work prior to 1st April 2013; Part 2 for work prior to the 2nd Part 36 Offer; and Part 3 for work conducted post the 2nd Part 36 Offer. Despite the order making no mention of indemnity costs, the bill appeared to claim the same. Although a claim for indemnity costs was made, the drafter did not think it was necessary to mention anything about the pre-issue Part 36 Offer which was soundly beaten at Trial. In fact, the Bill was in effect misleading as it made no mention of any costs orders that had been made against the Claimants (of which there were 2)

Points of Dispute were served and mostly contained template points (unfortunately as many do nowadays) and general deductions as to time. Unfortunately, the Replies were much worse as they mostly failed to deal with the issues raised in the Points. They failed, like the bill, to refer to how and why the costs were incurred and why they should be deemed proportionate. There were also clear occasions where the file was not even reviewed when the Replies were drafted and sent to the Solicitor in good faith.

At the resulting Provisional Assessment, the Court made its assessment and following the same, the Defendant (who had previously made Part 36 Costs Offers of £38,500) calculated that the assessment came out at around £26,800.00.

The Claimant did not make their own calculation and replied back seeking to accept the £38,500 without any costs consequences (a tactic used previously by this particular firm – clearly they must have thought it was a good offer after all).

I received the full file of papers just 13 days before the hearing along with the bill, PODS and Replies and made my own calculation of the PA. I suggested that it came out at approximately £1,000 more.

Just one week before the hearing, the costs draftsman released their file to the solicitors and upon receipt I had noticed that it was the costs draftsman who had sent the request for the oral assessment. There appeared in the file no advice to the solicitor regarding the same and certainly no advice regarding the Part 36 offer.

Now knowing what items were to be challenged, I arranged for the appropriate papers in support of the bill to be filed at Court (albeit a few days late).

Upon considering the challenges and the papers it was quite clear that the result was a fair one and advice was given against proceeding to the oral hearing. I cited clear errors within the Replies which I had found from reviewing the papers and also noted omissions from the bill which if both had been dealt with earlier could have avoided such a terrible result.

Unfortunately, against advice I was instructed to attend the hearing and upon going through a page-by-page assessment of the papers it became clear that the problem was much worse than first thought.

The bill had been drafted poorly and was on the verge of being found to be wholly inaccurate with many items duplicated – a potential for the PA result to be reduced even further.

I therefore took instructions to settle the matter at the figure assessed at PA along with the costs of the assessment to be paid to the Paying Party.

However, during the lunch time break it was also found that the PA figure that the Defendant had put forward had never been agreed or even challenged by the costs draftsman. As such, I had to take instructions on whether I should agree the Defendant’s figure (as a re-calculation no doubt would have increased costs – and by not even bothering to challenge the same, the costs draftsman had by way of conduct accepted the same)

Whilst it clearly was not a great result for the solicitor client, it highlighted the fact that the costs drafting firm used in this case was:

Not up to the task of drafting a bill accurately and honestly;
Not able to prepare Replies accurately taking into account the facts of the case or the file of papers;
Not competent enough to even calculate what the assessment figure was so compelling the solicitor client to accept the Defendant’s calculations
Not willing or able to attend the assessment (despite their advice being to request an oral hearing)
Potentially negligent in giving advice or not as the case may be in respect of the Part 36 Offer
Oh despite all this, they still want their 35 hours bill drafting fee paid and their £1,500 assessment costs paid on top.

Here at White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd, we can draft bills accurately and honestly taking into account all of the facts to ensure maximum recovery of your costs in as quick a time as possible.

We have a fee structure that ensures the same – i.e. our fees will depend on your costs recovery.

We will provide advice at the outset before your bill is served so you know roughly how the case is going to run and at what cost.

As an example, we recently drafted an RTA Bill of Costs. Because our bill told the full story and was honest, we recovered Grade B rates for the RTA Claim which settled at Allocation and for a sum of just £3,000 damages.

We have a 73% recovery rate and all settlements have been achieved prior to PODS (because the Defendant’s don’t have a leg to stand on)

If you require any of our costs drafting services, why not try us out for 1 file and compare us.

I say us of course to mean the company however to be honest as always it is just me.

Filed Under: Blog Tagged With: Costs, Costs Drafting, Costs Draftsman, Legal Costs

Reasons to Talk to Us

SAVE up to 67% versus a typical high street solicitor
FREE Initial consultation
Fully Insured, Experienced and Regulated
White Collar has the knowledge and expertise you need
We are easy to talk to and give advice in plain English
If we can’t do the job, we know someone that can
Nationwide and Worldwide coverage

Contact Us

  • 1 Old Hall Street, Liverpool, L3 9HF
  • [email protected]
  • 0151 230 8931
  • 0151 808 1320

Online Enquiry

* indicates required field
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The information you provide will be only used by us to administer your enquiry and any response. Use of this form does not create an attorney-client relationship and information transmitted will not necessarily be treated as privileged or confidential. If you are a client, please get in touch with your usual firm contact directly for the most timely response.

Twitter

Tweets by @WhiteCollarQPAS

Services for Solicitors

We provide Costs Drafting, Advocacy, Locum Fee Earner and Litigation Support services to Solicitors:

Costs Drafting

We have 13 years experience in Civil & Commercial Litigation, Personal Injury and Costs therefore we are able to draft bills accurately and in a compliant manner to ensure maximum recovery at speed and at low cost.

Our payment terms are also competitive:

  • Bill drafting fees reduced as per recovery – ensuring that we will recover the most we can for you;
  • Fixed negotiation fees – to ensure speed and efficiency;
  • Quick turnaround with maximum settlements – to aid your cash flow;
  • Capped fees for Paying Party work;

We are simply interested in good, honest costs drafting, negotiation and advice and our aim is to ensure that your needs come first.

Therefore, unlike other costs drafting firms, we will provide you with the advice before negotiation commences so we both know where we stand in terms of likely recovery and cash flow.

With a FREE Courier Service, we not give us a try for one file and compare us.

Locum Fee Earner/Litigation Support

Having over 12 years experience in civil litigation, We have been assisting solicitor firms with their busy case loads by acting as a fee earner within their firms.

Advocacy

We are able to cover hearings across the North West and North Wales (we can travel further if needed) as your agent for Infant Settlement Approval Hearings, Possession Hearings (Landlord/Tenant and Mortgage) and Costs Hearings.  We can also cover applications, small claims and enforcement hearings.
With fixed fees being applied in many cases, we understand that the lower you pay for advocacy services, the more profit costs you keep for yourself therefore, our fees are reasonable and for most of our local Courts are even cheaper than those charged by the major advocacy agencies.

Administration Services

With over 10 years administration experience, White Collar can offer a wide range of services to assist you and your business in achieving its goals as well as allowing you to save time on things that matter most – your business. The following list is an example of those services offered by White Collar.

  • Copy Typing
  • CV Drafting
  • Data Entry
  • Form Creation
  • General Administration
  • Invoice/Receipt Management/Creation
  • List Building
  • Mail Forwarding/Scanning
  • Online Contact Management
  • Online Diary Management
  • Online Services
  • Powerpoint Presentations
  • Spreadsheets
  • Word Documents

White Collar Legal & Admin

We have over 13 years legal and administrative experience so we can help you with your most of your legal and admin needs.

Reasons to Talk to Us

SAVE up to 67% versus a typical high street solicitor
FREE Initial consultation
Fully Insured, Experienced and Regulated
White Collar has the knowledge and expertise you need
We are easy to talk to and give advice in plain English
If we can’t do the job, we know someone that can
Nationwide and Worldwide coverage

Like us or follow us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

We are members of…

PPR Practising Certificate

Business Approval Register

Lawshare

Civil Litigation solicitors Wirral

Clerksroom Direct

PPH Logo

Privacy Policy | © 2023 White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd
Website hosting by Lift Legal Marketing · Log in


The White Collar & Scales Logo is a registered trademark owned by White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd. White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales; Reg No.09105650; Registered Address: 1 Old Hall Street, Liverpool, L3 9HF. VAT Number: 273 5212 16.

Data Protection Registration: ZA069814. Our Privacy Policy can be accessed by Clicking Here
Philip Nam F.Inst.Pa G.CILEx Q.Med.Pa (Director) is a Fellow of the Institute of Paralegals (member#207496) and is authorised and voluntarily regulated by the Professional Paralegal Register.
The legal information given on this website is subject to our Legal Information Disclaimer which can be accessed by Clicking Here (opens in a PDF)
Our website use disclaimer can be found by Clicking Here (opens in a PDF)

This site tracks visits anonymously using cookies. Close this dialogue to confirm you are happy with that or find out more in the Privacy Policy. Agree and close
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT